€1.5 MILLION FOR A VIROLOGIST WHO PRESENTS SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF A CORONA VIRUS, INCLUDING DOCUMENTED CONTROL EXPERIMENTS OF ALL STEPS TAKEN IN THE PROOF.

 

WE DETERMINED...

All virologists, with the exception of the likes of Stefan Lanka, have deceived themselves and the public when they consider the existence of disease-causing viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 claim.

Virologists unintentionally kill cells in the test tube  and believe that this is proof of the presence and isolation of a virus.

Only from fragments of dying cells do virologists mentally construct a gene sequence and output it as a fact.

The test procedures therefore offer no meaning and meaning.

Typical structures of dying cells in the electron microscope are output as viruses.

 Such structures have never been proven or recognized in a human being!

OUR GOAL

These undesirable developments have far removed medicine from reality and understanding of true health. We want to make a contribution to bringing all people's understanding of illness and health closer together.

WE GUARANTEE:

€ 1.5 million for a virologist who provides scientific evidence of the existence of a corona virus, including documented attempts to control all steps taken to provide evidence. 

Details may be obtained at the following website:

 https://samueleckert.net/die-1-500-000-e-wette-der-isolatetruthfund-wurde-angenommen/

You're on!

It is important to refute:

1. Virologists interpret the death of cells in the laboratory as viral. Due to the lack of control tests, they overlook the fact that they kill the cells in the laboratory themselves and unintentionally, by starving and poisoning. This misinterpretation is based on a single publication by John Franklin Enders and a colleague from June 1, 1954. This publication was ruled by the highest judge in the measles virus process that it contains no evidence of a virus. This publication became the exclusive basis not only of measles virology, but of the entire virology since 1954 and the corona hysteria.

2. Virologists mentally / mathematically combine the shortest pieces of so-called genetic information from dying cells into a very long genetic trait, which they output as the genetic trait of a virus. This mental / arithmetical process is called alignment. They did not carry out the control attempts, the attempt to construct the desired genetic trait mentally / mathematically, even from short pieces of so-called genetic information from non-infected sources.

3. Virologists always need a given genetic trait of a virus for the alignment of a virus. However, they always use a genetic trait that is only created mentally / mathematically and never a real one that is found in reality. You never carry out the control attempts as to whether viral genetic strands of completely different viruses could be constructed from the existing data set or not.

4. Virologists have never seen or isolated, viruses in humans, animals, plants and their liquids. They only did this apparently, indirectly and only ever using very special and artificial cell systems in the laboratory. They never mentioned or documented the control tests as to whether they were able to represent and isolate viruses in and from humans, animals, plants or their liquids.

5. Virologists have never isolated, biochemically characterized or obtained their supposed genetic material from those supposed viruses that they photograph using electron microscopic images. They never carried out or published control experiments as to whether, after the isolation of these structures, „ viral “ proteins (the shell of the virus) and, above all, the viral genetic trait could actually be detected, which is the central component and characteristic of a virus should represent.

6. Virologists issue typical artifacts of dying tissues / cells and typical structures that result from swirling cell components such as proteins, fats and the solvents used as viruses or as viral components. Here, too, there are no control tests with non-infected but also treated cells / tissues.

7. The so-called transmission attempts that virologists make to prove the transferability and disease arousal of the suspected viruses refute the entire virology. Obviously, it is the experiments themselves that trigger the symptoms that are given in animal experiments as proof of the existence and effects of the suspected viruses. Here, too, there are no control attempts in which exactly the same thing is done, only with non-infected or sterilized materials.