⚖️ The Reformed Position: A Two-Edged Sword
🧩 The Claim:
Reformed theology teaches that if a person is truly saved (i.e., elected by God before the foundation of the world), then they cannot lose their salvation. This is known as eternal security or perseverance of the saints.
“They went out from us, but they were not of us…” (1 John 2:19) is commonly cited.
🔁 But the Tension:
If a person later falls away—commits apostasy, embraces sin, or rejects the faith—they were never truly saved in the first place.
Which means: the church may have called someone saved who actually wasn’t.
The church can baptize, affirm, and disciple a person, but if that person doesn’t persevere to the end, then:
The person was self-deceived.
The church was deceived.
But God's election is not in error.
🧨 The Dilemma:
This creates a no-lose theological loop for the Reformed system:
If you persevere, you were truly elect.
If you fall away, you never were.
Either way, the doctrine is “proven” true.
It cannot be falsified—because every outcome confirms the doctrine. But this also makes it non-pastoral in practice.
😶🌫️ Implication for Assurance:
While Calvinists claim to have the strongest assurance, this logic introduces existential insecurity:
“Am I really saved? Or will I be one of those who later proves I was never saved at all?”
This undermines real-time assurance. Many believers in Reformed churches live with latent anxiety, constantly examining themselves (cf. 2 Corinthians 13:5) not out of conviction but fear of being non-elect.
🧠 Theological Sleight-of-Hand:
As a get-out-of-jail excuse, Reformed elders can often resort to:
“We said you were saved, but now we say you were never saved. But don’t blame us—we all have deceitful hearts (Jeremiah 17:9).”
This introduces a paradox:
We cannot know the heart, yet we declare people saved (by their profession or fruit).
But later, if they sin grievously or apostatize, we retroactively declare they were never saved.
This turns subjective perseverance into the judge of objective justification, which undermines sola fide (faith alone) in practice.
🔄 Critique Summary:
| Reformed Logic | Critique |
|---|---|
| The truly elect will persevere | Circular reasoning: you’re saved if you persevere, but if you don’t, you never were. |
| Those who fall away were never saved | Rewrites history and absolves the church of discernment failure. |
| Assurance comes from election and fruit | Yet fruit is subjective, and election is unknowable—producing hidden insecurity. |
| Deceitful hearts (Jer. 17:9) explain error | Weaponizes human depravity to explain away failed discipleship and false assurance. |
Let's compare the views on securing salvation.
📊 Denominational Views on Eternal Security
|
Tradition |
View on OSAS* / Eternal Security |
View on Apostasy |
Condition for Final Salvation |
Key Scriptures Cited |
|
Reformed (Calvinist) |
✅ Affirms OSAS (Perseverance
of the Saints) |
True believers cannot fall away; those who do were never truly regenerated |
Unconditional election; God ensures perseverance |
John 10:28–29, Romans 8:30, Philippians 1:6 |
|
Arminian (Wesleyan) |
❌ Rejects OSAS |
Believers can fall away through
willful sin or unbelief |
Continued faith and obedience; salvation can be forfeited |
Hebrews 6:4–6, 2 Peter 2:20–22, John 15:6 |
|
Pentecostal / Charismatic |
❌ Generally rejects OSAS |
Emphasizes real risk of backsliding and apostasy |
Holiness, repentance, Spirit-led life; faith must endure |
Matthew 24:13, Revelation 2:10, 1 Corinthians 9:27 |
|
Roman Catholic |
❌ Does not teach OSAS;
affirms conditional salvation |
Mortal sin severs grace; apostasy is real and leads to loss of
salvation |
Faith plus works (grace-mpowered); must die in a state of grace |
James 2:24, Philippians 2:12, Galatians 5:4 |
|
Eastern Orthodox |
❌ Rejects OSAS; teaches
synergistic salvation |
Apostasy is real; salvation is a dynamic process that can be reversed
by sin |
Ongoing cooperation with grace; endurance, repentance, sacramental
life |
2 Timothy 2:12, Matthew 7:21, Hebrews 10:26–27 |
|
Baptist (Free Will) |
❌ Generally Arminian:
salvation can be lost |
Believers must persevere; falling away is possible and damning |
Free will response; continued faith and repentance |
Romans 11:22, Colossians 1:23, Hebrews 3:12–14 |
|
Southern Baptist / Reformed Baptist |
✅ Teaches OSAS as eternal
security for the elect |
Apparent apostasy proves false conversion |
God preserves the elect; backsliders return or were never truly saved |
1 John 2:19, John 6:37–40, Ephesians 1:13–14 |
|
Methodist |
❌ Rejects OSAS
(Wesleyan-Arminian tradition) |
Apostasy is real and must be guarded against |
Justification must be accompanied by sanctification and faithfulness |
Hebrews 3:14, Matthew 25:1–13, Galatians 5:1–4 |
|
Lutheran (Confessional) |
⚠️ Conditional security with
tension |
Real believers can fall from grace, but God is always willing to
restore |
Justification by faith alone; apostasy is possible through rejection
of faith |
Galatians 5:4, 1 Timothy 1:19, Hebrews 10:29 |
-
Reformed traditions emphasize eternal security but tie it to election and perseverance. Those who “fall away” never truly believed.
-
Arminian and Wesleyan traditions emphasize free will and the necessity of repentance and continuing to walk in the ways of the righteousness.
-
Pentecostals align with Arminians but often frame the issue in terms of holiness, Spirit-filled living, and spiritual warfare.
-
Catholics and Orthodox view salvation as a journey with God’s grace, which can be disrupted by mortal sin or rebellion.
-
Lutherans affirm strong assurance, but also acknowledge the possibility of falling from grace—often holding this in tension.
No comments:
Post a Comment