Tuesday, December 29, 2015

LOOK AT THE DAMAGE A HEAVY BOMBER WOULD HAVE CAUSED HAD IT HIT THE TWIN TOWERS. Unbelievable Evidence Of What Really Could Have Happened. This contrast of what happened when a heavy bomber hit The Empire State Building should not be overlooked.

Image of the photoshopped aircraft flying towards the Twin Towers. What is amazing is how contrary to the principles of engineering and the dynamics of physics, this aluminum plane purportedly flew right through the steel messed building and exploded so that a fireball came out the other side.

Vanga’s 9/11 prophecy talks of “American brethren” coming under attack “by steel birds”

1945 heavy Mitchell bomber crashes Into The Empire State Building, which, by the way, was not designed to withstand six passenger jets hitting at speeds of 500 mph like the Twin Towers were designed to withstand. The Mitchell was an exceptionally sturdy aircraft that could withstand tremendous punishment. The bomber was not built like the passenger planes that are built from aluminum today that begin to fall apart as soon as they hit a post. Note the limited damage caused to The Empire State Building.

The ten-ton, B-25 bomber smashed into the north side of the Empire State Building. The majority of the plane hit the 79th floor, creating a hole in the building eighteen feet wide and twenty feet high. The plane's high-octane fuel exploded, hurtling flames down the side of the building and inside through hallways and stairwells all the way down to the 75th floor.

One of the engines and part of the landing gear hurtled across the 79th floor, through wall partitions and two fire walls, and out the south wall's windows to fall onto a twelve-story building across 33rd Street. The other engine flew into an elevator shaft and landed on an elevator car. The car began to plummet, slowed somewhat by emergency safety devices. Miraculously, when help arrived at the remains of the elevator car in the basement, the two women inside the car were still alive.

Some debris from the crash fell to the streets below, sending pedestrians scurrying for cover, but most fell onto the buildings setbacks at the fifth floor. Still, a bulk of the wreckage remained stuck in the side of the building. [source: About.com.]

Now here is what happens when an aluminum aircraft hits a concrete wall at 500 mph.

Shills for the official story claim that the (steel-structure) buildings WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 collapsed after they were weakened by fire. 
But fire itself does not cause steel-structure buildings to collapse. Here are several cases of fires in such buildings, none of which collapsed.

In May 1988 a fire at the Interstate Bank Building in Los Angeles destroyed four floors and damaged a fifth floor of the modern 62-story building. The fire burned for four hours. The building did not collapse. Seewww.iklimnet.com/hotelfires/interstatebank.htmlIn February 1991 a fire gutted eight floors of the 38-story One Meridian Plaza building in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The fire burned for 18 hours. The building did not collapse. Seewww.sgh.com/expertise/hazardsconsulting/meridian/meridian.htm

In October 2004 in Caracas, Venezuela, a fire in a 56-story office tower burned for more 17 hours and spread over 26 floors. Two floors collapsed, but the underlying floors did not, and the building remained standing. See www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/10/18/world/main649824.shtmlIn February 2005 there was another "towering inferno" in Taiwan. The fire burned for about an hour and a half, but the building never came close to collapsing. See www.itv.com/news/world_404914.html

caracas fire

Windsor Building burningAlso in February 2005 the 32-story Windsor Building in Madrid, Spain, caught fire and burned for two days. The building was completely engulfed in flames at one point. Several top floors collapsed onto lower ones, yet the building remained standing. See news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4263667.stmSee also Christopher Bollyn's 9/11 and the Windsor Tower Fire.Windsor Building still standing
The still-uncompleted Beijing Television Cultural Center, containing the Mandarin Oriental Hotel, caught fire on 9 February 2009 (due to uncontrolled use of fireworks at Chinese New Year). 140,000 tons of steel was used in its construction. It burned for five hours, but it did not collapse. Seewww.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/world/asia/10beijing.html
In November 2010 an apartment block in Shanghai caught fire (reportedly caused by welders) and 53 people died. It burned for more than four hours. The building did not collapse. See www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1330095/Shanghai-apartment-block-killed-53-started-unlicensed-workmen.html.
0n February 20, 2015, a fire "ripped through the Torch in Dubai — one of the tallest residential buildings in the world", reports The Independent. Did the building collapse? No.

It is not well-known that WTC1 itself survived a serious fire in 1975. It started on the 11th floor and spread to six other floors, burning for three hours. For more details seeThe World Trade Center Fires (Not So Hot eh?). How come WTC1 survived a 3-hour fire in 1975 but completely collapsed as the (alleged) result of a fire lasting less than two hours on 9/11?

In response to this question one reader wrote:
I would submit that none of the other buildings were hit by a heavy aircraft moving at 500 miles per hour, which sheared off many beams, support structures, etc. The shock to the tower must have been tremendous! Isn't this obvious?
It may be "obvious" that a heavy plane hitting a skyscraper would deliver a "tremendous" shock, but it doesn't follow that the building must therefore collapse. In 1945 the Empire State Building was hit by a B-25 bomber, but it was still standing last time I saw it. "Ah yes, but it was the impact plus the fires!" Well, when the B-25 hit the Empire State Building "its fuel tanks were reported to have exploded, engulfing the 79th floor in flames", as we read at Empire State Building Withstood Airplane Impact.

"Ah, but none of the buildings mentioned above were struck by a 390,000 pound aircraft traveling at 350+ m.p.h." Well, each of the Twin Towers was still standing 50 minutes after being hit, so it was not the impacts which caused them to collapse. "Ah, but the intense heat of the burning jet fuel!" Actually, according to NIST's chief WTC-investigator the jet fuel burnt itself out in less than ten minutes. Don't believe it? Read through Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11: Claim #6. Then go to the top and read it all. Then follow the links to other articles on this website showing that the official story is bogus. Then follow the links to the many other websites which demonstrate that 9/11 was an inside job. Too busy? Oh, well, then, if you don't care to know what really happened on 9/11 ...

What you have heard ever since 9/11 on network TV and in the mainstream media such as the New York Times and all the other corporate-controlled newspapers is simplythe official story, repeated over and over, on the assumption that if a lie is repeated often enough then people will believe it. Especially if it is a big lie. The idea that elements of the US government were responsible for planning and carrying out acts which killed about 3000 people is so outrageous that most people (most Americans, at least) reject it reflexively. But it is precisely because it is so outrageous that the perps assumed that no-one except a few fringe thinkers would ever take it seriously, and that they would get away with this act of mass murder. What they didn't count on was that thousands of websites would minutely examine the evidence available (such evidence as was left, mainly photographic, after New York Mayor Giuliani ordered every scrap of physical evidence removed from the WTC site as quickly as possible, with nothing but a token forensic examination, and shipped overseas to be melted down in blast furnaces).

An examination of the evidence which remains leads inexorably to the conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job, perpetrated by elements within the US government, with Israeli assistance (probably going back before Bush came to power in 2001) in order to justify US military aggression against any country which stands in the way of its aim of global economic, financial and political domination. Maybe you think that the deaths of 100,000 Iraqis, the bombing of any country that the US chooses to bomb, thousands of deaths and injuries among US soldiers, and the contempt of all other countries for the US, are worth it to maintain US global domination; but what about the mass murder of around 3000 people, mostly US citizens, in New York City on 9/11? A small price to pay? This website presents much of the evidence that elements within the US government carried out this atrocity, and there are also many other websites which do so. If you can read then there is now no excuse to plead ignorance.-source: http://www.serendipity.li/wot/other_fires/other_fires.htm

No comments:

Post a Comment