Sunday, January 21, 2024

THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS SAID TO HAVE THE SAME NUMBER OF HEADS AS THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND. The Creature From Jekyll Island Devours The American Economy While Masquerading As A Public Institution. Not every body can accept that this is so, but if you want a sneak preview, keep reading.


Andrew Jackson was nearly assassinated because he opposed the establishment of a central bank. John F. Kennedy was killed because he intended to do away with the Federal Reserve. Donald Trump has the central bankers quaking in their pants. Will Donald J. Trump go the way JFK? Injection advocate and predictor of pandemics, Bill Gates once suggested that he might.

G. Edward Griffin wrote the controversial The Creature From Jekyll Island, a six hundred page book that delves into the creation of the Federal Reserve, a privately owned central bank that masquerades as a government institution. 


The following is a review of The Creature From Jekyll Island by Jared and is found at Goodreads.

In the early 1910s, a group of wealthy men got together in secret on Jekyll Island of the coast of Georgia to hatch a devious plan to revise the U. S. banking system (the plan they developed is now referred to as theFederal Reserve System / aka 'central banking'):

The Jekyll Island Plan As summarized in the opening chapter of this book, the purpose of that meeting was to work out a plan to achieve five primary objectives:

- Stop the growing influence of small, rival banks and to insure that control over the nation's financial resources would remain in the hands of those present;
- Make the money supply more elastic in order to reverse the trend of private capital formation and to recapture the industrial loan market;
- Pool the meager reserves of all the nation's banks into one large reserve so that at least a few of them could protect themselves from currency drains and bank runs;
- Shift the inevitable losses from the owners of the banks to the taxpayers;
- Convince Congress that the scheme was a measure to protect the public.

The premise of the book is to undo this plan for the following reasons:

In the foreword, it was stated that there were seven reasons to abolish the Federal Reserve System. It is time to repeat them:

- It is incapable of accomplishing its stated objectives.
- It is a cartel operating against the public interest.
- It is the supreme instrument of usury.
- It generates our most unfair tax.
- It encourages war.
- It destabilizes the economy.
- It is an instrument of totalitarianism.

What emerged was a cartel agreement with five objectives:

- stop the growing competition from the nation's newer banks;
- obtain a franchise to create money out of nothing for the purpose of lending;
- get control of the reserves of all banks so that the more reckless ones would not be exposed to currency drains and bank runs;
- get the taxpayer to pick up the cartel's inevitable losses; and
- convince Congress that the purpose was to protect the public.

But the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Federal Deposit Loan Corporation now guarantee that massive loans made to large corporations and to other governments will not be allowed to fall entirely upon the bank's owners should those loans go into default.

The end result of this policy is that the banks have little motive to be cautious and are protected against the effect of their own folly

Examples of bailouts:

- This came to pass with the creation of AMTRAK in 1971 and CONRAIL in 1973. AMTRAK took over the passenger services of Penn Central, and CONRAIL assumed operation of freight services. CONRAIL is a private corporation.
- The government now had a powerful motivation to make sure Lockheed would be awarded as many defense contracts as possible and that they would be as profitable as possible.
- The bank continued to flounder and, in 1983, what was left of it was resold to the former Detroit Bank & Trust Company, now called Comerica.
- A fitting epilogue to this story was written two hundred years later when, in 1980, the First Pennsylvania Bank of Philadelphia, the "oldest bank in the nation," was bailed out by the FDIC.
- (The bank and auto bailouts of 2008 are obvious, recent examples)

Central Bank
- Whether or not to have a central bank in the U.S. has been a huge, recurring political fight. (It has been implemented and defeated and implemented again at least 4 times).
- Hamilton fought diligently against the idea.
- The Federal Reserve System (central bank is unconstitutional: The Constitution prohibits both the states and the federal government from issuing fiat money. This was the deliberate intent of the Founding Fathers who had bitter experience with fiat money before and especially during the Revolutionary War.)
- Andrew Jackson risk his political career on fighting against it.
- The Federal Reserve System is a form of a central bank in place again today (*heavy sigh*)
- Our central bank model is patterned after the Bank of England: The charter was issued in 1694, and a strange creature took its initial breath of life. It was the world’s first central bank.
- The reality of central banks, therefore—and we must not forget that the Federal Reserve System is such a creature—is that, under the guise of purchasing government bonds, they act as hidden money machines which can be activated any time the politicians want.
- the central-bank mechanism was so attractive to the political and monetary scientists that it became the model for all of Europe.

Inflation
- Fiat money (money printed by government without any backing) is the cause of inflation, and the amount which people lose in purchasing power is exactly the amount which was taken from them and transferred to their government by this process.
- Inflation, therefore, is a hidden tax. This tax is the most unfair of all because it falls most heavily on those who are least able to pay: the small wage earner and those on fixed incomes. It also punishes the thrifty by eroding the value of their savings.
- LAW: A nation that resorts to the use of fiat money has doomed itself to economic hardship and political disunity.
- When money is created out of nothing, the true interest is not 8% or 9% or even 22%. It is infinity.
- By creating money through the banking system, however, the process became mystifying to the general public. The newly created bills and notes were indistinguishable from those previously backed by coin, and the public was none the wiser.
-

Inflation is a hidden tax
- Inflation is a hidden tax that robs citizens of purchasing tax that politicians can pass by simply printing more money. The public is none the wiser because they don't see it come out as taxes. However, your loss of purchasing power (because additional money is flowing through the economy, goods cost more and your dollar doesn't stretch as far)

Paying off the national debt doesn't even help because the system is so broken:
- The national debt is the principal foundation upon which money is created for private debt. 120 To pay off or even greatly reduce the national debt would cripple our monetary system. No politician would dare to advocate that, even if surplus funds were available in the Treasury. The Federal Reserve System, therefore, has virtually locked our nation into perpetual debt.

The elite exploit the system while most of us are ignorant:
- the Rothschild investment house in London to an associate banking firm in New York. It contained an amazingly frank and boastful summary: The few who understand the system [bank loans earning interest and also serving as money] will either be so interested in its profits or so dependent upon its favors that there will be no opposition from that class while, on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending,... will bear its burdens without complaint.

Lincoln's concern for the future:
- The money power preys upon the nation in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the republic destroyed.

INTERESTING NUGGETS:
- Among primitive people, the most usual item to become commodity money was some form of food, either produce or livestock. Lingering testimony to this fact is our word pecuniary, which means pertaining to money. It is derived from the word pecunia, which is the Latin word for cow.
-
- Origin of the dollar:
- Monetary historians generally first associate the dollar with one Count Schlick, who began striking such silver coins in 1519 in Joachim's Thal, Bavaria. Then called "Schlicktenthalers" or "Joachimsthalers," the coins became known simply as "thalers," which transliterated into "dollars." Interestingly, the American colonies did not adopt the dollar from England, but from Spain.
- On July 6, 1785, Congress unanimously voted to adopt the Spanish dollar as the official monetary unit of the United States.
- After ratification of the Constitution, a dollar would contain 371.25 grains of fine silver, and all items in commerce, including other coins, were to be measured in value against that standard.
-
- Origin of 'green backs': In 1862, Congress authorized the Treasury to print $ 150 million worth of bills of credit and put them into circulation as money to pay for its expenses. They were declared as legal tender for all private debts but could not be used for government duties or taxes. The notes were printed with green ink and, thus, became immortalized as "greenbacks." Voters were assured that this was a one-time emergency measure, a promise that was soon broken. By the end of the war, a total of $ 432 million in greenbacks had been issued.
-
- Russian Navy in U.S. Civil War??: The presence of the Russian Navy helped the Union enforce a devastating naval blockade against the Southern states which denied them access to critical supplies from Europe.
-
- The following images are from the Fabian Society (a group of Socialists who are part of this plot:




























Stained glass window of Fabian Society (socialists)
























Logo of Fabian Society (a wolf in sheep's clothing)




Friday, January 12, 2024

Economic Collapse? Don't Look Over Here, though, You Will See What Is Really Happening



In this brief reality check:

·      US Dollar vs Australian Dollar

·      Psychiatrist Declared Delusional

·      Attempt To Weaken Trump

·      All Women US Presidential Ticket

·      Slush Funds For The U Know Who

·      Defective WHO Tests

·      Israel's Supreme Court (bigger implications than you may think)

·      Jacob & Esau

plus more....(connect the dots).

The US dollar currently forms the basis of the world's economies by being the reserve currency. The US can print as much money as it likes. Every other country's economy suffers. Printing US dollars dilutes the US dollar, but the other currencies are diluted more. USA residents complain about the purchasing power of the global reserve dollar, when, relatively speaking, they have it ever so good.  

For example, the Australian dollar, September 12, 2012, was worth US $1.06. By March 20, 2020,  the Australian dollar had nearly halved in value by $0.51, to US $0.55.  

At that time, Dr Russell McGregor, an Australian psychiatrist, was de-registered,  because he has published on his website information of what had been going on in the USA. The Board of Psychiatry had another psychiatrist evaluate him and, because McGregor refused to admit that he was mistaken about the existence of the Deep State, he was deemed delusional and a danger to his patients.

McGregor's assessment was there was going to be ten days of darkness (not tribulation though), when a huge operation would take place beginning 1st April and finishing 10th April, Good Friday, 2020. This psychiatrist demonstrated that he truly believed in his evaluation of American and global politics that he was prepared to lay his reputation on the line, not to mention his professional qualifications.

Was the coronavirus a Democrat operation designed to weaken Trump and cause him to lose the election?

With Trump weakened and Biden suffering dementia, some believed a Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama ticket would be a surefire card for the Democrat Presidential Nomination.

Ockham's razor cuts deep.

The hatred of everything Trump, espoused by the mainstream media (MSM), was evidence of collusion and a conspiracy to remove the USA President. Remarkably, Trump has never been accused of being homosexual, whereas Obama was never accused of being a lady's man, but definitely a homosexual.  Moreover, Obama was given a Nobel Peace Prize for being elected President and treated with kid gloves and praise for his two terms (despite the fact he had a fetish for dropping bombs that killed innocent people). 

·      Assassination attempts of Trump failed.

·      The Mueller investigation failed. 

·      Impeachment failed. 

·      Celebrity slander failed. 

·      The public panic and ensuring hoped-for mayhem over the coronavirus pandemic is failing.

World Health Organisation and its agents issued tests that produced false positives . When there was noise that they were not to be issued in the US, Hillary Clinton tweeted:Where are the tests? 

The aim of introducing the Coronavirus was: 

1.    Create fear and panic 

2.   Derail China negotiations

3.   Cause unemployment to rise

4.   Cause share markets to crash

5.   Devastate the global economy

6.   Blame this all on President Trump

7.   Make room to shelter Biden

Other objectives were: the introduction of US mail voting, same day registration voting, no I.D. voting, securing funding for various NGOs, so money that Trump has stopped can flow back into Democrat slush funds.

Slush fund example:

The then current head of the US Center for Disease Control, Dr. Deborah Birx was funnelling $US100m to Marie Yovanovitch (who testified against Trump) in a circle of fraud involving George Soros, Bill Gates, US State Department Diplomacy, the UN, PEPFAR and the Global Fund to create a slush fund for, among other things, nefarious purposes.

Global Bio-weapon

From all accounts, there appears to have been a coordinated effort to introduce a betacoronavirus (nCoV), similar to MERS, with the intention to wipe out 69 million people and cause economic havoc worldwide during 2020. MERS was deadly, but mainly restricted to Middle East.

The Poynter Institute claimed that it debunked the claim that a simulation where 69 million people are wiped out in 2020 by a new coronavirus (nCoV) was conducted (October 2019) in partnership between Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the World Economic Forum, then admited:"The Oct. 18 outbreak simulation actually did happen.

MSM and agents posted propaganda headlines knowing that few people would read the whole articles. They bury the truth within the story to cover any liability against knowingly falsely reporting disinformation, but in such a way that it goes unnoticed.

This current conspiracy against the rest of us involves numerous players and has been going on for some time. The arrest of a Harvard University Biochemistry Professor and the closing of millions of phone accounts in China point to the nefarious activities that were taking place. Evidently what was designed to occur failed. 

Coronavirus Cure

Dr Vladimir Zelenko reported that hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc effectively cured within hours all 350 patients that presented with the coronavirus symptoms.  Combined with azithromycin, hydroxychoroquine also cures patients.

Doctors were told to include every death as coronavirus

What this meant for the rest of the world was the current madness should have been very short-lived, if the clowns embedded in Southern Hemisphere governments didn’t insist that these economies being locked down until the middle of Spring (October). 

Easter Sunday, April 12, 2020, coincided with Child Sexual Abuse Day, and the evil ones (Epstein’s fiends) hated the fact that they were going to be exposed by the light shining in the darkness.

Alarmists Create Fear

Apart from hearing all the alarmists (Global Warming/climate change), politicians and government departments, who seek to gain greater control over citizens, there became a recognition of the need for countries to have their own manufacturing and supply lines that enable essential daily requirements to be available within their own jurisdictions, rather than having the prospects of being held hostage by China or any other dictatorial regime.

Nevertheless, just as the worldwide Y2K scare, pushed in the late 1990s, is now considered a joke because all the experts took the alarmists seriously, so, too, this “alarmist” coronavirus scare will seem like a joke in the future, when compared to the flu, which kills more people.


Unlike the COVID-19 scare, the Y2K scare did not shut down anything but rather contributed to the global economy prior to the year 2000--the dot.com bubble burst about three months after the event did not materialize.

The Dow Jones Index (DJIA) had peaked at 11722.98, January, 2000, and then took over six years to get back to that level, August, 2006. The Nasdaq lost 80% of its value.

On Nov. 8, 2016, the DJIA closed at 18327.29. On the March 23, the low for the day was 18213.65. The forecast from this writer was the DJIA would rise higher.

The worldwide lock-down allowed for members of the Cabal to assess how to introduce a One World Government in the days to come.

Always remember the deceiver has more than one option up his sleeve. The United Nations are still playing a major part in events through the World Health Organization.

Rupert Murdoch was said to have been a shrewd businessman and always had at least five cards up his sleeve. Once Murdoch went into battle against the South African born Robert Holmes-a-Court over a newspaper group, and finished a little poorer. Murdoch declared that he had never met anyone who had more cards up his sleeve than himself. Holmes-a-Court took a chunk out of Murdoch financially, but died (1990) a relatively young man (53 yrs). Murdoch (now 89 yrs) has gone on to team up with Rothschild (Genie Oil) in obtaining oil rights over Syrian territory that have been issued by Israel.

Interestingly, Rothschilds withdrew from their involvement in fixing the gold price in 2004, yet they have been active buyers of gold ever since, and Trump merged the Fed with the US Treasury, with many believing gold is going to play a big role in the future.

With the trillions of dollars being printed by governments around the world, there is going to come a time when a new global reserve currency will be introduced and the gold price ($US 1500) is going to escalate—some predict $US 50,000. 

The Q-files (November 11, 2017 post) suggest that Rothschilds (worth $US 2 trillion) are going to be brought down during Trump's presidency, along with the Sauds (worth $US 4 trillion) and Soros (worth $US 1 trillion). The Q-files are not to be dismissed.

Trump declared Jerusalem the capital of Israel. Modern Israel exists because of the Rothschilds. The Knesset (Parliament) exists because of the Rothschilds. The Supreme Court of Israel exists because of the Rothschilds and Noahide laws require one to adjudicate over regional court decisions. When the magician says look over there--you know the rest.

On Sunday, 22nd March, 2022, when in prayer waiting upon the Lord God to speak, I was alerted to Jacob's trouble with Esau and what this represents today. Jacob grew up close to his mother's breast. Esau was a man of the world. Those who understand the Milk of the Word will be strong. Those who resort to Esau's methods, will miss out, even though they will seek what they lose; only, it will be in vain. One would thing that surely there will be more than five wise virgins who are ready for the Second Coming, but then, maybe not. The wise and the foolish are representative of two classes of people, similar to what Jesus said about Mary and Martha.

Jesus Visits Martha and Mary

Now as they went on their way, he entered a village; and a woman named Martha received him into her house. And she had a sister called Mary, who sat at the Lord’s feet and listened to his teaching.  But Martha was distracted with much serving; and she went to him and said, “Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me to serve alone? Tell her then to help me.” But the Lord answered her, “Martha, Martha, you are anxious and troubled about many things; one thing is needful. Mary has chosen the good portion, which shall not be taken away from her." (Luke 10:38-42)

At that time, Jesus continued, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from clever and learned people and have revealed them to little children.  Yes, Father, because this was pleasing to you. Everything has been entrusted to me by my Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son wants to reveal him.

“Come to me all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, because I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. (Matthew 11:25-29)

 Sharing is Caring

visit The Mail for Global Weekly

Thursday, January 4, 2024

MESSIANIC JEWS ARE NOT ACCEPTED BY THE JEWISH COMMUNITY. Clearly The Jewish Community Are Not As Inclusive Of All Who Claim An Earthly Jewish Heritage. This problem seems universal. Why this is so? "Jews for Jesus" provide an explanation.

 Every Jew in the first century knew that Jesus was Jewish. That was not an issue. And while there were mixed reports regarding his character and competency—some thought he was a troublemaker, others saw him as an ignorant Galilean, still others believed he was sent from God—most concluded that he was not the Messiah. To believe otherwise would mean exclusion from the synagogue.

…for already the Jews had decided that anyone who acknowledged that Jesus was the Messiah would be put out of the synagogue.” (John 9:22)

This exclusion amounted to more than simply social shunning. It was more like an organized quarantine. At the time synagogues were central to the fabric of daily Jewish life. Exclusion from the synagogue had an economic as well as a social impact on those first-century Jewish believers in Jesus. The administrative move to “revoke the membership” of any Jewish Christian from the synagogue was only the first step. The second step came near the end of the first century when the Jewish community altered the liturgy in order to keep those Jewish believers in Jesus who might still secretly be in the synagogue from participating in mainstream Jewish life.

Liturgical changes to exclude Jewish believers

The following benediction was added to the Shemoneh Esreh and is still recited in synagogue services today:

“And for the slanderers (meaning heretics) let there be no hope, and let all wickedness perish as in a moment; let all thine enemies be speedily cut off, and the dominion of arrogance do thou uproot and crush, cast down and humble speedily in our days. Blessed art thou, O Lord, who breakest the enemies and humblest the arrogant.”1

The above “blessing” came to be known as the “Benediction on the Minim,” which means those belonging to a sect, but was understood to mean “heretics.” An older form of the benediction used the word “nozrim,” or “Nazarenes,” which was an explicit reference to Jewish Christians. While neither term is used today, the original prayer institutionalized the elimination of Jewish believers from the synagogue. Whoever failed to recite that benediction would be removed under suspicion of being a heretic:

“Said Rabban Gamaliel to the Sages: Can any one among you frame a benediction relating to the Minim? Samuel the Lesser arose and composed it. The next year he forgot it and he tried for two or three hours to recall it, and they did not remove him. Why did they not remove him seeing that Rab Judah has said in the name of Rab: If a reader made a mistake in any of the other benedictions, they do not remove him, but if in the benediction of the Minim, he is removed, because we suspect him of being a Min?—Samuel the Lesser is different, because he composed it.”2

A lesser-known liturgical change historically attributed to the existence of Jewish Christians was the daily recital of the Ten Commandments. A common misunderstanding within the Jewish community was that Jewish believers in Jesus had contempt for the law. Therefore the recitation of it was discontinued, “because of the cavilling of the heretics, for they might say: These only were given to Moses on Sinai.”3

A historical litmus test for loyalty

After the destruction of the Temple in 70 C.E., Israel was certainly in a national emergency mode. While Jewish belief in Jesus was tolerated by some up to that time, the Jewish establishment did not feel it could absorb too many defections from status quo Judaism without jeopardizing its national existence. The tragedy of the Second Roman War of 132-135 c.e. further established the alienation of Jewish believers in Jesus from Jewish life. Rabbi Akiba, sometimes called “The Father of Rabbinic Judaism,” hailed the leader of the revolt as Bar Kochba, (meaning “son of the star”). In that act, Akiba acclaimed him as the Messiah who fulfilled the promise of Numbers 24:17:

“I see Him, but not now;
I behold Him, but not near;
A Star shall come out of Jacob;
A Scepter shall rise out of Israel,
And batter the brow of Moab,
And destroy all the sons of tumult.”

Many Jews followed Akiba’s lead, rallying around their supposed Messiah who would lead them to victory. Jewish believers in Jesus could not stand with them without denying Jesus, the one they knew to be Messiah. Thus they did not fight and die alongside their Jewish brothers and were seen as traitors which further alienated them from the rest of the Jewish community.

For 2000 years, Jewish community leaders have continued this tradition of exclusion. Despite the celebrated pluralism of today’s Jewish community, there remain tens of thousands of men and women, born of Jewish parents, who are being excluded from the rest.

Jewish loyalty today

Loyalty as a Jew today rests not on whether one is ready to go to war against Jewish oppressors. It doesn’t even hinge on Zionism or agreeing with a particular brand of Israeli politics. How to live Jewishly is a question that has more than one acceptable answer for a very diverse Jewish population.

Ironically, the litmus test for Jewish loyalty rests on a theological dictum. The one unifying statement that most Jews can make is to say, “We don’t believe in Jesus.” Whether one is Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or even an agnostic or atheistic Jew, there seems to be a strange comfort in that statement. If you can say it, you are “in.” That is the litmus test.

Structural changes to exclude Messianic Jews in the twenty-first century

In addition to the loyalty factor, Jewish believers in Jesus have been made to feel like outsiders through some institutionalized methods. The most apparent structural block is the “Law of Return,” which defines the basis for immediate citizenship for Jews wanting to emigrate to Israel. Part of the definition of Jew requires that one “does not profess another religious faith.” The Israeli Supreme Court, in Beresford v. Minister of the Interior, 43 (iv) P.D. 793 (1989), held that “one who was born Jewish but is a member of a congregation of Messianic Jews, or Jews for Jesus, or similar groups, is one who professes another religious faith and therefore is not eligible for the benefits of the Law of Return.”4

The law states that Jews who believe in Jesus are not Jews for the purpose of making aliyah and the implication can be drawn that they are not Jews for any purpose. This has become increasingly problematic as there are more and more Israeli born Jews who have embraced Jesus as Messiah.

An excommunication ruling by The Rabbinical Court of Justice of the Associated Synagogues of Massachusetts, made it clear that Hebrew Christians do not have the right to have their sons circumcised under Jewish law, to be married by a rabbi or be buried in a Jewish cemetery. The Court warned, it is moreover, “forbidden for any Jew, Rabbi, Cantor or Sexton, to officiate or to participate in any such religious ceremonies with such converts to another faith.”5

How have such rulings had their outworkings in the lives of individual Jews who have found Jesus as their Messiah? Jessica’s* story might provide some insight.

A twentieth-century reaction to a Jew for Jesus

When I first started attending Congregation Ner Tamid, I had been a believer in Jesus for a little over a year. I had moved from New York into a new community, and while I wanted to be connected to others who believed in Jesus, I didn’t want to stop being a part of a traditional Jewish congregation. When an older believer in Jesus who was also Jewish, said to me, “If you want to start attending synagogue, just be prepared for the day when you will be asked to leave,” I was indignant, “That’s not so,” I told him. “I have no intention of being kicked out!”

And so I became a faithful member of my Conservative congregation. I approached the rabbi early on to let him know exactly who I was and what I believed. He listened and said, “Jessica*, you are welcome here as long as you don’t use this place to proselytize.” I told him that I respected the synagogue and that I was not intending to use it as a platform for evangelism. I also told him that if people asked me what I believed that I would not refrain from telling them. We had struck a bargain that was agreeable. My membership dues were accepted, and one by one different members of the congregation got to know me as a Jewish believer in Jesus. But of course, not everyone knew. I spent some time with the rabbi and his family. I suppose he thought he would bring me back to his brand of Judaism, and in my own naive way, I thought I might help him discover Yeshua (Jesus).

I remember being glad that my friend who had cautioned me about “being thrown out of the synagogue” was wrong. The High Holidays were approaching, and I was looking forward to the special services at my congregation. And then it happened. My photo appeared in the local paper. I was taking part in an evangelistic event on a local campus, and the caption beneath my punim made it clear that I was standing for Jesus. When I entered the synagogue that Saturday morning, the president of the congregation and the cantor both met me at the door.

Traitors like you

“Meshumad,” they cried out. “We don’t want traitors like you here; you don’t belong in this place!” I could feel myself shaking. The entire synagogue was in an uproar, and the rabbi had not arrived yet.

Moments later he walked through the door and he understood at once what was going on. He called me aside. Before he could speak, I said, “Rabbi, this is a time for people to worship and not a time to have this kind of a dispute going on. I’ll leave now and we can talk after Shabbat.”

He was relieved, and I walked out the door. I managed to make it about 20 yards before the tears started flowing. How could this happen? I thought. “I was a good member of this congregation. I had friends here. I was part of this community. What was my crime? I believed in Jesus.”

The rabbi and I talked later that night. It seemed that both the cantor and the president of the congregation threatened to resign if I remained a member. I remember the rabbi’s words to me: “I’ll withstand them, even if they quit, if you promise me one more thing—that you will not share your faith anywhere in the county where we’re located.” I was saddened by the rabbi’s words. He knew that I could not agree to such a demand and be faithful to the teachings of Yeshua. I had to resign. I received a refund of my membership dues in the mail, and I was never welcome to return from that day on.

It hurt a lot. I never tried joining a synagogue again.

What does this all mean today?

It has been said that Jews who believe in Jesus have abandoned the Jewish institutions and separated themselves from the Jewish people, but isn’t it the other way around? Ancient and even recent history seem to bear out the fact that Jewish believers in Jesus were intentionally isolated from mainstream Judaism. Today, Jews who believe in Jesus are told they have abandoned their Jewish roots and will eventually cease to be Jewish. Lionel Koplowitz, president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews is typical of Jewish leadership in this analysis:

“It is a fallacy to suggest that one can be both a Jew and a Christian. Throughout history those who have become converted to Christianity have, immediately, or after a lapse of time, ceased to be Jewish. The separation of Christianity from Judaism in the first century may have been a tragedy; it was, alas, inevitable.”6

Not only is their future as Jews denied by those representing the Jewish institutions, but their motivation for accepting Jesus is seen as less than honorable. Eugene Borowitz, writing in Reform Judaism, points out,

“The demographic precariousness of the Jewish people and the reality of antisemitism taints every convert—out as one who seeks self—gain by joining the oppressors, casts aside the proud record of Jewish accomplishment, and makes it more difficult for others to carry our traditions forward. In the post-Holocaust era, converting out is in Emil Fackenheim’s luminous phrase, giving Hitler a posthumous victory.”7

Such rhetoric seems self-serving at best since such leaders appoint themselves judge and jury in excluding Jewish believers from the community.

What is fair?

In today’s pluralistic society, Jews of every theological and philosophical stripe are included within the community in celebration of Jewish diversity. It would seem that at least some elements of the Jewish community might find room in their hearts for Jews who believe in Jesus. After two thousand years of exclusion, such Jews are as prevalent as they were in the first century. Yet it seems that the polarization we see in politics and between races has been rooted in the Jewish community for a very long time. Jews who believe in Jesus may not be able to hope for acceptance and inclusion, but they can try to focus on the real issue at stake. If Jesus is the Jewish Messiah, believing in him is not only right, it’s the most Jewish thing one can do. Jesus did claim to be the promised Messiah. Responding honestly and openly to that claim is the real and only way to deal fairly with the issue. It is the way Jesus himself asked his followers to respond:

“When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, ‘Who do people say the Son of Man is?’ They replied, ‘Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.’ ‘But what about you?’ he asked. ‘Who do you say I am?’ Simon Peter answered, ‘You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.’ Jesus replied, ‘Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven.'” (Matthew 16:13-17)

What about you?

If Jesus is who he claimed to be, then it is right and good for Jews and everyone else to believe in him.

Is it possible that your thoughts about him are primarily reactions shaped by concerns over being excluded from what is considered mainstream Judaism? Have you struggled with the notion that following Jesus would make you a disloyal Jew, an outcast?

If you had to choose to close your mind to the possibility that Jesus might be true in order to be considered a good Jew, would you do it? Or would you be willing instead to ask the creator of the Jewish people what a good Jew should think about Jesus?

*not her real name

This article was first published by Jews for Jesus April 2018.

Endnotes

1. Hertz’s Authorized Prayer Book (New York: Bloch Publishing Co., 1961), pp. 142-45.

2. Soncino Talmud, Berachot 28b-29a.

3. Soncino Talmud, Berachot 12a.

4. Menachem Elon, Jewish Law, History, Sources, Principle, (Jewish Publication Society: Philadelphia, 1994), p. 1690.

5. The Jewish Times, “Rabbinical Court Rules Against Jewish Christians,” 3/20/72.

6. The Times, London, “Evangelism and Jews,” by Lionel Koplowitz, President, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, February 22, 1991.

7. Reform Judaism, “Are We Too Soft on Apostates?” by Eugene B. Borowitz, Summer 1996.